Don't settle for less. Without integrated networking, Clouflare leaves big gaps for adversaries to exploit.
|
No |
What to look for? |
Exium |
Cloudflare |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SASE Service Integration | Purpose-built, multi-tenant, multi-tier SASE solution focusing on seamless integration and MSP partnerships for efficient go-to-market. | Cloudflare's SASE services are perceived as new and pieced together from multiple products, with an operational focus on CDN and DDoS. |
| 2 | Operational Focus | Pure-play SASE platform with a dedicated focus on MSP partnerships and providing comprehensive security and networking solutions. | Cloudflare's primary focus is on CDN and DDoS, potentially affecting the depth and specialization of their SASE offerings. |
| 3 | Customer Support | MSP-centric approach, offering better deployment and management support through MSP partnerships compared to email support from Cloudflare. | Cloudflare's support may be perceived as less responsive or tailored to MSP-specific needs. |
| 4 | Network Controls and Features | Offers direct network controls through its SD-WAN capabilities, providing a comprehensive solution. | Cloudflare is reported to lack direct network controls and email notifications for rule violations, potentially limiting functionality for some customers. |
| 5 | Feature Improvements and Limitations | Continuous improvement with a focus on MSP partnerships, providing a mature and evolving SASE solution. | Users report a need for feature improvements and cite nuanced limitations, poor support for Windows services, and challenges with customizations and layered policies. |
| 6 | SD-WAN Integration and Firewall Replacement | Cloud-native SD-WAN and a software-only solution for firewall replacement, offering a streamlined and unified approach. | Cloudflare SASE requires a separate SD-WAN from another vendor and cannot replace on-premises firewall appliances, potentially introducing complexity. |
| 7 | User Experience and Interface | Single-pane-of-glass for administration, management, and visibility, offering an intuitive and robust user experience. | Users report Cloudflare's web interface as somewhat clumsy and not robust, potentially impacting ease of use. |
| 8 | ZTNA Implementation and Limitations | Offers a holistic ZTNA implementation with a focus on flexibility, security, and support for various usage scenarios. | Users report limitations and challenges with Cloudflare ZTNA, including nuanced limitations, poor support for Windows services, and issues with the WARP client. |
| 9 | Licensing and Customer Satisfaction | Transparent and simple pricing model with a focus on customer satisfaction through MSP partnerships. | Users report challenges with Cloudflare licensing, describing it as greedy, with potential issues related to the WARP client and different usage scenarios. |
Exium's Cloud-Native SASE Solution stands out as the preferred choice for MSPs over Cloudflare SASE. With a dedicated focus on MSP partnerships, seamless integration, comprehensive features, direct network controls, and a streamlined approach to SD-WAN and firewall replacement, Exium addresses the specific needs of MSPs and their SMB/Mid-Market clients more effectively. Cloudflare's perceived limitations, operational focus, challenges with feature improvements, and reported complexities in user experience highlight the advantages of choosing Exium for a modern, efficient, and customer-centric SASE solution.